College football playoffs proposed extension gives NCAA a dozen reasons to cut regular season by one game
In pursuit of another college football playoff championship, Alabama will face such demanding opponents as Florida, Texas A&M and LSU. The Tide will also play Mercer, who finished his previous season fifth in the Southern Conference.
Georgia will face Charleston Southern, who lost their last game to an SEC opponent by 62 points. Oklahoma is set for a game against the Western Carolina Catamounts, who finished six games under .500 in 2019. This is how it often happens in Game 12 of college football, which is about as essential for sport than “flying wedge” training.
Yes, that’s right: it should be banned.
It was back in 2005 that the NCAA board of directors executed one of the most egregious cash foreclosures in college sports history, which we all know says a lot. There was no good reason to approve the extension of the college football regular season to 12 games other than getting an extra home gate for power schedules.
And there’s even less reason to let go if the sport’s executives are serious about expanding the playoff structure to include 12 teams and, potentially, four games for participating teams.
The late Myles Brand was a good man and an effective leader for the NCAA during his presidency, but it’s hard to believe he managed not to laugh when he defended the expansion of the schedule by stating, “The season doesn’t. will not be extended; it just means that the week off would be abolished.
There were also humorous discussions in the papers about the growth of the schedule that suggested it could result in more high-profile non-conference games, perhaps even between geographic rivals. Pitt and Penn State have played four times in 15 seasons since.
No, it has always been all about the money. It’s no small amount, and every FBS school has participated in this revenue growth in their own way, whether it’s playing an extra home game if they had that scheduling power or going out on the road for a payout. guaranteed.
The proposed expansion of the playoffs to 12 teams triples the number of teams involved and more than triples the inventory of championship tournament games. Champions from the six highest-rated conferences will receive an automatic bid, meaning that at least one team from outside the “Autonomy Five” conferences will be represented.
This means there will be a dramatically expanded playoff revenue pool, in terms of both TV revenue and grid revenue. And the assurance in this system that all conferences will have, in a sense, a representative, means that all conferences, in a sense, will share that abundance.
There has been a lot of public reaction about the impertinence of stretching the season for teams entering a 12-team CFP up to 16 or 17 games, which would be the number if a team qualified for the final with or without bye. . And, at first glance, those who have spoken out against this concept are right.
However, their concerns can be resolved simply and painlessly, with one-page NCAA legislation that could be approved by the board.
The 12th game must be played.